Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In seems there are two dimensions that underlie most judgments of traits, people, groups, and cultures. Although the definitions vary, the first makes reference to attributes such as competence, agency, and individualism, and the second to warmth, communality, and collectivism. But the relationship between the two dimensions seems unclear. In trait and person judgment, they are often positively related; in group and cultural stereotypes, they are often negatively related. The authors report 4 studies that examine the dynamic relationship between these two dimensions, experimentally manipulating the location of a target of judgment on one and examining the consequences for the other. In general, the authors' data suggest a negative dynamic relationship between the two, moderated by factors the impact of which they explore.
منابع مشابه
The development of stereotype content: The use of warmth and competence in assessing social groups.
Past research suggests that warmth and competence are primary dimensions of social perception used by adults to understand social groups. The current study investigated whether children use these two dimensions to structure their representations of familiar groups. Results indicated that adult warmth and competence judgments were independent from one another and placed groups in warmth by compe...
متن کاملCompensation versus halo: the unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment.
Recent work on the relations between the two dimensions of social judgment, that is, warmth and competence, evidenced compensation such that a group seen more positively than another group on one dimension is seen less positively on the second. The authors examine the status of this compensatory relation by introducing a third dimension in the judgment context. Experiment 1 extends earlier work...
متن کاملCompetence and warmth in context: The compensatory nature of stereotypic views of national groups
In two experiments we show that the context in which groups are perceived influences how they are judged in a compensatory manner on the fundamental dimensions of social judgment, that is, warmth and competence. We manipulate the type of country (high in competence and low in warmth vs. high in warmth and low in competence) to which a target country is compared. Our data show that the target co...
متن کاملWarmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map
The stereotype content model defines two fundamental dimensions of social perception, warmth and competence, predicted respectively by perceived competition and status. Combinations of warmth and competence generate distinct emotions of admiration, envy, pity, and disgust. From these intergroup emotions and stereotypes, the BIAS (behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes) map predicts di...
متن کاملYou want to appear competent? Be mean! You want to appear sociable? Be lazy! Group differentiation and the compensation effect
Using the two fundamental dimensions of social judgment, warmth and competence, we show that, contrary to general models of impression formation, negative information on one dimension has positive consequences on the way a target is judged on the other dimension. Participants learned about two groups which were either congruent on warmth and competence (one group high on both and the other low ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of personality and social psychology
دوره 89 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005